26 million copies of your wang out there

[VikingJuice]

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92833535

Hard to believe it's been 17 years.

[Jessie]

I hope it grew some.

[sapphirehart]

Does anyone wonder why that wasn't considered child pornography?

[Jessie]

Nudity != porn, even for kids.

It has to be sexual in nature, or intended for sexual gratification.

[ReBurn]

Nudity != porn, even for kids.

It has to be sexual in nature, or intended for sexual gratification.

Are you saying that you can have all of the pictures of naked kids you want as long as the person that took them did it for reasons other than to provide sexual gratification? My guess is that the FBI disagrees with you.





[attachment deleted by admin]

[Jessie]

Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.

[ReBurn]

Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.

[attachment deleted by admin]

[Jessie]

Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.

It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent.  Musta been slacking that day.

[ReBurn]

Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.

It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent.  Musta been slacking that day.

I'm just teasing you...I'm sorry. 

[Jessie]

Well, I know that my brother videotaped his daughter getting in and out of the shower, and though they charged him with video voyeurism, they couldn't prosecute him because it was impossible to prove that he masturbated to the tape.

So, there's that.

In conclusion, yes, you can have pictures of naked kids if there's no sexual intent.   That's not to say you can't be falsely prosecuted, but as far as the law is concerned, childhood nudity isn't inherently illegal.

It was just like that, except with my sister in law peeking around the corner, instead of that dude, and pedobear was noticeably absent.  Musta been slacking that day.

I'm just teasing you...I'm sorry. 

I know, dummy.  I'm not upset.

[Beefy]

There was a time when naked pictures of your kids were to be used as a means of embarrassment with neighbors and family members.

[ReBurn]

That was back when we knew our neighbors.